Special Issue on Auditing of Terminologies

نویسندگان

  • James Geller
  • Yehoshua Perl
  • Michael Halper
  • Ronald Cornet
چکیده

This special issue is the first in any journal to deal exclusively with the auditing of medical terminologies and ontologies. In the early stages of many emerging technical fields, the emphasis is primarily on creating systems that work. The emphasis eventually shifts to guaranteeing a high level of quality. In fact, two sure signs that a technical field is maturing are extensive activities regarding standards—both national and international—and quality assurance initiatives. In the field of medical terminologies, we have seen a great deal of standards activity in recent years, such as the work of the ISO/ TC215 Working Group 3 (Health Informatics – Semantic Content) and the American National Standards Institute guidelines for designing controlled terminologies (ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005). There is also a heightened awareness of the need for terminology quality assurance, which has manifested itself in different ways. For example, at the 2007 AMIA Annual Symposium (Chicago), a session was devoted exclusively to terminology assessments (S10). One can also discern a constant stream of research papers in the medical informatics literature dealing with auditing. The breadth of this work, as measured by the number of different terminologies being considered, is growing. The reference list and Table 6 of the paper by Zhu et al. [1] in this special issue give evidence to these observations. Furthermore, many health care information systems rely on terminologies to provide semantically uniform access to knowledge expressed in different ways and following various paradigms. As a result of this reliance, an error in a terminology may propagate to errors in systems ranging from decision-support systems to pharmacy information systems that are monitoring, for example, drug allergies and drug-drug interactions. Hence, an error in a terminology may further propagate, resulting in an error in the treatment of patients. Realizing these facts, the guest editors came to the conclusion that the field of medical terminologies is maturing and that there is enough interest within the research community to warrant producing this unprecedented special issue on ‘‘Auditing of Terminologies.” The intention is to capture the current state of the art in the field of terminology auditing. In addition to announcing the Call for Papers for this special issue on the JBI Web-site and in other forums, the guest editors directly solicited prominent researchers in this area to submit papers. Fortunately, most of them agreed. The current issue features many authors with outstanding track records in the areas of medical terminologies and their quality assurance. To ensure high-quality published papers, many of the authors were asked to serve in the role of reviewer aswell. Some researchers who were too busy to prepare papers themselves graciously agreed

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A review of auditing methods applied to the content of controlled biomedical terminologies

Although controlled biomedical terminologies have been with us for centuries, it is only in the last couple of decades that close attention has been paid to the quality of these terminologies. The result of this attention has been the development of auditing methods that apply formal methods to assessing whether terminologies are complete and accurate. We have performed an extensive literature ...

متن کامل

Detecting Role Errors in the Gene Hierarchy of the NCI Thesaurus

Gene terminologies are playing an increasingly important role in the ever-growing field of genomic research. While errors in large, complex terminologies are inevitable, gene terminologies are even more susceptible to them due to the rapid growth of genomic knowledge and the nature of its discovery. It is therefore very important to establish quality-assurance protocols for such genomic-knowled...

متن کامل

Auditing the NCI Thesaurus with Semantic Web Technologies

Auditing biomedical terminologies often results in the identification of inconsistencies and thus helps to improve their quality. In this paper, we present a method based on Semantic Web technologies for auditing biomedical terminologies and apply it to the NCI thesaurus. We stored the NCI thesaurus concepts and their properties in an RDF triple store. By querying this store, we assessed the co...

متن کامل

Structural methodologies for auditing SNOMED

SNOMED is one of the leading health care terminologies being used worldwide. As such, quality assurance is an important part of its maintenance cycle. Methodologies for auditing SNOMED based on structural aspects of its organization are presented. In particular, automated techniques for partitioning SNOMED into smaller groups of concepts based primarily on relationships patterns are defined. Tw...

متن کامل

Analyzing polysemous concepts from a clinical perspective: Application to auditing concept categorization in the UMLS

OBJECTIVES Polysemy is a frequent issue in biomedical terminologies. In the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), polysemous terms are either represented as several independent concepts, or clustered into a single, multiply-categorized concept. The objective of this study is to analyze polysemous concepts in the UMLS through their categorization and hierarchical relations for auditing purpose...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of biomedical informatics

دوره 42 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009